Maine's Leading Independent News Source
Fort Fairfield Journal About Us Contact Us Advertising Rates Subscribe Distribution Bible Reference Our Library
Feds Use Boston Bombing to Advance Police State Agenda
FBI and Mainstream Media Losing Control of the Narrative to Alternate News Sources
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, May 1, 2013
“The story from the officials is the official story, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is true or accurate.” This maxim has been proven time and again by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as they have historically interfered with, participated in and covered up a multitude of terrorist events perpetrated on U.S. soil over the past several decades. The recent bombing during the Boston marathon is yet another chain in contrived events with fabricated stories by the FBI—a government agency that Americans are now becoming more and more distrustful of.
First it was the siege on Randy Weaver where the FBI shot and killed his unarmed wife in cold blood. Then there was Waco where dozens of men, women and children- members of the Branch Davidian church - were tortured shot and some even burned to death under the direction of the FBI. and BATF. Then there was the Oklahoma City bombing where the FBI attempted to divert the public's attention away from an obvious controlled demolition, which takes weeks to plan and set up, on the Murrah Federal Building to a lone Timothy McVeigh and a crude truck bomb.
The FBI confiscated all surveillance video tapes from businesses in the area, concocted a narrative of the events, and have never allowed those tapes to see the light of day because they would not corroborate their "official" story. Then there was the first World Trade Center bombing where retired Egyptian army officer, Emad Salem admitted to the New York Times to be working with the FBI as they orchestrated a facade and equipped some radical Muslims to blow up one of the World Trade towers. Of course, the FBI narrative was a couple of lone radical Muslims did it alone and the mainstream news media dutifully parroted that line. Next up was the FBI's involvement in covering up the 9/11 attacks in September, 2001. In addition to creating a storyline about Muslim hijackers and buildings imploding due to aircraft strikes, which has essentially been debunked by even the most casual researcher, the FBI also confiscated video surveillance cameras from the area of all building implosions, especially the Pentagon. One video surveillance camera was at a gas station that had full view of the Pentagon where a plane supposedly hit but the FBI has confiscated that camera and the video footage and has never allowed it to be shown because it would conflict with their fabricated "official" story of a plane hitting that building. Along with a myriad of school and other public shootings, the FBI is always on location to cover, conceal and orchestrate an "official" storyline, even to the point of using paid and trained disaster actors- as they did in Newtown, Connecticut at the Sandy Hook school shootings - to give interviews to local media as if they were actual witnesses to the event.
Now along comes the next terrorist attack, this time in Boston earlier this month. Few people are aware that, like 9/11, there was a bomb drill planned by police and federal officials at the exact date and time that the actual bombings took place during the Boston Marathon.
University of Mobile’s Cross Country Coach, Ali Stevenson, who was near the finish line of the Boston Marathon when a series of explosions went off, reported that marathon runners were told before the bombing that a “drill” was taking place involving bomb sniffing dogs and spotters on roofs and to remain calm, although police later denied that any exercise had taken place. He said he thought it was odd there were bomb sniffing dogs at the start and finish lines. “They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about,” Stevenson told Local 15. “It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.” On their Twitter site shortly before the bombing, the Boston Globe tweeted, “Officials: There will be a controlled explosion opposite the library within one minute as part of bomb squad activities.”
Another oddity is there appear to have been at least five private military contractors operating on scene at the Boston marathon, some of them carrying black backpacks which look very similar to the backpacks carrying the bombs. The men, all wearing tan BDUs, tan combat boots, black jackets and black backpacks also had insignia indentifying them as members of the Blackwater-style private military/security firm, Craft International. According to Mike Adams, from Natural News, “The mainstream media is completely censoring any mention of these 'Craft' operatives, pretending they don't even exist. Only the alternative media is conducting real investigative journalism on these bombings. The mainstream media isn't interested in the truth; they only want to spin the attack into a new way to somehow blame conservative Americans for something they had no part in.”
InfoWars.com posted pictures of these operatives on their Facebook page only to have Facebook block the posts as “spam”- another telltale sign that a federal government cover-up is taking place.
The FBI's alleged bombing suspects are Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. According to UPI, the father of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects told reporters in Russia that he suspected his two sons had been framed. Anzor Tsarnaev told the Los Angeles Times in a telephone interview he did not believe Tamerlan and Dzhokhar had anything to do with the fatal attack in their adopted home town and had been singled out because of their Muslim faith. “It is a provocation of the special services who went after them because my sons are Muslims and don't have anyone in America to protect them,” said the elder Tsarnaev, who spoke to the Times from the Dagestan region. He added his boys had no training in handling firearms or explosives. The two brothers are most likely the FBI's chosen patsies for this event.
“Setting up a patsy isn't as difficult as one might imagine,” said Carl Worden, who has interviewed some of the players in the JFK assassination and has reviewed the recent Boston bombing in that light. “Let's take this instant case in Boston. We already know the FBI was contacting the two brothers accused of the Boston Marathon bombing, long before that fatal day. What if the handlers or someone sent by them contacted the brothers to help with a bomb drill scenario to check how effective security was at the Marathon? What if these handlers told the brothers to mix with the crowd wearing bulky back packs the handlers gave them, and were told to place those backpacks in certain locations when the crowd was distracted by the racers reaching the finish line? They had nothing to hide, right? They were working with the security detail, right? Why should they try to hide their faces when everybody knows full well that there are cameras everywhere at an event like that, not just security cameras, but news cameras and private phone cameras? Why did the surviving brother have his bill-cap turned in reverse to fully reveal his face in that camera-ridden environment? But when the brothers saw their faces all over the news, that is when they realized they had been set up and took off running -- just like Oswald did.”
As to the theory that the bombing was done by trained jihadists, Don Cline, a researcher of these types of terrorist events, noted, “This attack seemed to be a bit amateurish for a trained jihadist: Two explosive charges timed to go off 12-15 seconds apart, but not close enough together for the second charge to get the first responders to the first charge. Then a third charge at the JFK library several miles away. Of course, additional charges have been found that did not detonate, which may further indicate amateur incompetence. The great cloud of white smoke looked like a black-powder charge to me, which is an explosive but not a high explosive. I figure it may have been a lone jihadist, but probably of the same incompetence level as the shoe-bomber. He did some serious damage to people, while accomplishing nothing.”
“It would not surprise me in the least if this were another false flag operation. Once begun, the fear factor must be kept alive to condition the public to demand that they be protected,” said Bob Jungles. “The real truth is that it is not the police departments' jobs to protect people. They are there for the sole purpose of protecting the corporate interests. If that means a group of people being shot, as in Newtown, Connecticut, or maimed as in the Boston Massacre, so be it. Remember the Hegalian Dialectic is government's tool to gain control of the masses by whatever means works; Create the problem, generate a reaction, develop the solution, and arrive at the pre-planned and desired result. If that means a whole bunch of dead people, so be it. Control, ultimately leading to ‘Absolute Control,’ is the objective. Do not be fooled. Avoid crowds any place like you would avoid the Plague. Crowds draw fire as in mass shootings and bombings. Be alert to your surroundings.”
The reaction the government wanted was to condition people to be afraid and accept a martial law style police state apparatus constantly quashing any liberty or freedom the American people think they might still have. This is in preparation for the police state crackdown that will occur when the Federal Reserve finally pulls the rug out from under the U.S. economic system and crashes the currency. According to Mark Slavo from the website,www.shtfplan.com, “By all accounts, law enforcement and military personnel have classified Boston and surrounding towns a war-zone, especially after a gunfight yesterday evening that left one of the Boston Marathon Bombers dead and the other still at large. In a video of the early morning engagement, rapid gunfire and explosive detonations, believed to be more ‘pressure cooker’ bombs, can be heard as police and residents scrambled. This has led to shelter-in-place orders being issued by officials, a widespread militarization of nearly a hundred square miles surrounding Boston, and deserted streets throughout the city. Military personnel have reportedly been patrolling streets, performing door-to-door searches, and defusing or detonating suspected explosive devices.”
The FBI was reportedly at odds with the Boston Police who were releasing information to the public before first passing it through government censors in order to “get the story right.”
“One official source said the dispute centered on who would be the first to release information to the public that a suspect had been discovered,” wrote Bill Gertz on thefreebeacon.com. “In past major crime investigations involving federal and local police similar disputes have broken out but the differences are normally kept from the public. The official said investigators are very worried that the media disclosures undermined efforts to locate the suspect or suspects, by tipping them off and perhaps allowing them to don disguises and escape the national and international manhunt now underway. FBI and Boston police spokesmen could not be reached for comment on the internal dispute.”