Back to Fort Fairfield Journal WFFJ-TV Contact Us
.
India’s Recent Death Surge Could Be
Caused by the COVID Vaccines, Not the Virus
Few are Willing to Admit the Problems Found with Coronavirus Vaccines in 2004 Could be What’s Manifesting Deaths Today
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, May 5, 2021
With over 100 million doses of the experimental COVID-19 vaccine administered in India as of April 10, the people in that country are now dropping like flies as deaths soar. But, the virus is being made the scapegoat while the vaccine isn’t even considered as the cause of those deaths.
According to thehindu.com, the National AEFI Committee admitted to 180 deaths related to the experimental COVID-19 vaccines as of March 29, 2021.1 However, there have been several thousand deaths recently in India with post mortems in many cases not being conducted.
The first two experimental vaccines to be used in India were Covaxin, developed by Indian pharmaceutical company, Bharat Biotech International Ltd. and the Indian Council of Medical Research, and Covishield - a recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus vector vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and manufactured in India.
The third vaccine most recently approved in India was the Russian Sputnik V, which was developed by Gamaleya National Research Center of Epidemiology and Microbiology and the Russian Direct Investment Fund.
In light of the recent blood clotting problems found with AstraZenneca’s vaccine, the Sputnik V report showed that there are significantly more deaths following vaccination with Pfizer than with AstraZenneca.2
The recent alarming surge in deaths in India has been attributed to COVID-19, its “variants” or anything else under the sun except the experimental vaccines. To listen to the government bureaucrats, the narrative sounds eerily similar to the propaganda being pushed in the U.S., claiming the vaccines are “safe and effective.” The establishment left wing news media isn’t much better, with “Fact Check” headlines out in force deflecting all attention away from the vaccines and giving the vaccine manufacturers full cover and concealment in what is shaping up to be a war on humanity. It’s important to note that the vaccine/pharmaceutical industry is heavily involved in financing the former with political payouts and lobbying fees and the latter with generous advertising campaigns. So, the narrative is clenched: “Move along folks, nothing to see here; it is simply not possible that the deaths could be caused by the COVID-19 vaccines.”
Or is it?
Because the COVID-19 scare has become so politicized - more than any other virus in history - the profit potential so huge and the narrative by politicians and the media so carefully crafted to generate the maximum amount of fear and hysteria to herd the sheeple into an untested, experimental DNA-altering vaccine, researchers must go back to coronavirus vaccine studies that were conducted prior to the advent of the most recent SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 coronavirus in order to gain objective scientific data about the potential and adverse side effects of these types of vaccines.
In 2004, the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP) reported that researchers in Canada found hepatitis in ferrets after injecting the animals with an experimental vaccine for SARS-CoV and were urging caution as other investigators develop and test SARS coronavirus vaccines.3
Like our current COVID-19 vaccine, researchers then noted that immunization with the coronavirus vaccine induced a rapid immune response following exposure to the virus. But, researchers discovered a downside of the vaccine when they checked the ferrets’ liver and found severe hepatitis. Their report stated, “Extra caution should be taken in proposed human trials of SARS vaccines due to the potential liver damage from immunization and virus infection.”
In 2012, researchers at the University of Texas looked into the side effects of various types of coronavirus vaccines and noted, “Clinical trials with SARS coronavirus vaccines have been conducted and reported to induce antibody responses and to be ‘safe’. However, the evidence for safety is for a short period of observation. The concern arising from the present report is for an immunopathologic reaction occurring among vaccinated individuals on exposure to infectious SARS-CoV, the basis for developing a vaccine for SARS...vaccine evaluations in mice supports caution for clinical vaccine trials with SARS-CoV vaccines in humans.”4
All of this cautionary advise on coronavirus vaccines, related to the deadly side effects of those vaccines was noted around a decade prior to the recent coronavirus vaccine for COVID-19, now being marketed like a new brand of soda pop by the left wing news media around the world.
Now, fast-forward to March, 2020 as the first human trials began in the U.S. for Moderna’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine, which was developed in just two months and skipped animal trials completely.
The following month, Eriko Padron-Regalado published a paper entitled, Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: Lessons from Other Coronavirus Strains. In it he noted, “Studies about the safety of vaccines against SARS and MERS are relatively scarce. There is a concern about the induction of antigen-dependent enhancement (ADE) and other adverse effects derived from vaccination or natural exposure. ADE is a phenomenon that occurs when non-neutralizing antibodies against proteins of a virus enhance virus entry to host cells, also enhancing virus infectivity...In the case of SARS, antibody-dependent enhancement and other adverse effects induced by vaccination in animal models have raised some concerns...Due to the relatively new emergence of such vaccine platforms, their performance with coronavirus diseases is still to be known.”5
Yet, just eight short months later the COVID-19 coronavirus vaccine was magically deemed “safe and effective” even though it skipped animal trials and somehow had purportedly solved all of the problems plaguing coronavirus vaccines for the past seventeen years. Or, did it really?
In March, 2020, a much more cautionary approach to the COVID-19 vaccine was published in the journal Nature by Shan Su, Lanying Du and Shibo Jiang. The article, entitled Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines6 noted, “Moore and Klasse concluded in a review that ‘it is not known what benchmark serum antibody and NAb titers must be reached for a SARS-CoV-2 protein vaccine to protect humans...The S protein is the major antigen in most COVID-19 vaccine candidates under development as it contains the major neutralizing apitopes and is located on the surface of the viral particle. However, the full-length S protein of SARS-CoV also contains several immunodominant sites that can induce non-neutralizing antibodies, including those associated with ADE, or harmful immune responses...Currently, the unabated spread of COVID-19 has prompted several countries to rush into local vaccine approval without a comprehensive safety evaluation. Vaccines for viruses with high transmissibility but low case fatality, such as SARS-CoV-2, should usually have a higher bar for safety than those for viruses with low transmissibility but high case fatality.”
The authors of the report also stated that vaccines for coronavirus can actually make viruses more infectious through a process called Vaccine-Associated Disease Enhancement (VADE); “Currently, the mechanisms that underlie VADE have not been clearly defined because its emergence is highly virus, host and antigen specific...vaccines for infection by viruses that will cause inflammatory damage are likely to result in VADE; for example, SARS-CoV and RSV.”
But, despite all the warnings, the U.S., India, UK and many other countries around the world rushed the experimental vaccines into the population with no animal trials and scant human testing in otherwise healthy test subjects with no co-morbidities, thus skewing the results in favor of the vaccines. The Phase III tests, normally done under controlled situations are now being conducted worldwide in the human population with the vaccines being granted “emergency use” authorization so they could bypass all of the required testing for safety.
With deaths increasing despite the COVID-19 vaccines, health officials in India are, like most other countries, unwilling to consider the vaccine as the problem, mostly for political reasons. “The National Committee is depending on evidence and investigations conducted at the local level. However, we observed a strong tendency by local authorities to immediately rule out any links to vaccination, even before investigation has been conducted,” Ms. Malini Aisola, a Public Health Researcher based in Delhi told The Hindu. “There is an urgent need to strengthen AEFI investigation at the local level where protocols may not be adhered to and the quality of evidence being collected is often weak and inadequate.”
notes:
3.) https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2004/12/sars-vaccine-linked-liver-damage-ferret study
4.) https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0035421
5.) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177048/
6.) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y