Back to Fort Fairfield Journal WFFJ-TV Contact Us
.
FDA Admits COVID-19 PCR Tests Were Based on “Contrived” SARS-CoV-2 Specimens
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, September 8, 2021
In a document updated as of December 7, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) admitted the PCR tests for COVID-19 that the media was beating everyone over the head with all last year (and this year) were based on “contrived” virus models.1 This is because there were no actual purified SARS-CoV-2 virus specimens available to build and calibrate those woefully inaccurate PCR tests with.
The document states of the in vitro diagnostic (IVD) [i.e. PCR] tests they granted Emergency Use Authorization for:
“During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens were not readily available to developers of IVDs to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”1
The definition of “contrived” is, “invent, design, not natural, artificial, scheme.” Or, as we say in The County, it’s “Bull$h!t.” This admission by the FDA means they allowed PCR test kit manufacturers to build the whole virus model up in a computer and used that to design and build the PCR tests that were used to declare someone as a “positive case” for COVID-19.
What’s worse, the FDA admits the tests from different manufacturers used “different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources,” so the tests between manufacturers weren’t even standardized; essentially conforming to the Wild-Ass Guess (WAG) pseudo-scientific model.
It is on the basis of the irrational fear generated by these bogus “contrived” PCR tests that an entire human population has been deceived, duped, cajoled and buffaloed into falling for government mandates and deadly and dangerous gene therapies masquerading as “vaccines.”
The U.S. CDC recently announced it was withdrawing its request for Emergency Use Authorization for these sundry PCR tests because the tests cannot distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 and the other viruses that cause normal, seasonal flu.2
Additionally, these contrived PCR tests were designed to be excessively sensitive, keying in most cases on non-infectious viral fragments then labeling the person as an “asymptomatic positive case” when they were not even sick at all to begin with.
Kerry Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, advised these tests should never be used for diagnostic purposes.
Notes.