Back to Fort Fairfield Journal WFFJ-TV Contact Us
.
COVID ‘vaccines’ Found to Reduce Immune System Effectiveness
COVID ‘vaccine’ Recipients Overall Have 7 Times Greater Incidence of Sickness After Receiving the Shots When Compared to those Who Have Naturally Acquired Immunity from the Virus, Itself.
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, October 6, 2021
The current left wing media narrative is fixated on selling the idea that the unvaccinated are the ones spreading the COVID-19 “Delta variant” but there is mounting evidence from around the world that the spread of new disease is actually being fueled by the vaccinated group.
Bob Neugebauer, from Gem State Patriot notes, “Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-19 patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of COVID-related hospitalizations overall. In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and deaths show 87% of those who have died from COVID-19 in the third wave that began in early July were vaccinated. Data from the U.K. show a similar trend among those over the age of 50. In this age group, partially and fully “vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations and 70% of COVID deaths. The CDC investigated an outbreak of COVID in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, in July and found 74% of those who received a diagnosis of COVID-19, and 80% of hospitalizations, were among the fully vaccinated.”1
A recent report was published entitled, “Comparing SARS CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections”2 It found people who were vaccinated had a greater incidence of COVID sickness after they were vaccinated when compared to those who had caught the disease, acquired natural immunity and did not receive a vaccine.
Del Bigtree, host of The Highwire, explained, “This study was trying to prove that the 'vaccine' works just as good whether you had a previous infection, or not. But, it actually reveals something I don't think they intended.”
The study, still to be peer reviewed, found there was an increased risk for disease in naive vaccinees. In this context, “naive” means people who received a COVID-19 'vaccine' but had not been previously infected by the virus. The study states, “The increased risk was significant (P<0.001) for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naive vaccinees had a 5.96-fold (95% CI, 4.85 to 7.33) increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold (95% CI, 5.51 to 9.21) increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2-naive vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected...This study demonstrates that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.”
Another study, waiting peer review, entitled, “Significant reduction in humoral immunity among healthcare workers and nursing home residents 6 months after COVID-19 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination.”3 found the so-called 'vaccines' actually reduced a person's immunity to SARS-Cov-2 after six months' time, even in those who had caught the virus prior to the injection and had pre-existing natural immunity.
The study looked at humoral immunity (humoral refers to any of the various body fluids used to determine a person's health and disposition) from 2 weeks to 6-months post-vaccination in 120 nursing home residents and 92 ambulatory healthcare worker controls with and without pre-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection (ambulatory means they are able to walk and get around). This means all participants had been vaccinated but some healthcare workers had previously been infected by the virus and had natural immunity before vaccination and they were comparing the two groups.
The study found, “Anti-spike, anti-RBD and neutralization levels dropped more than 84% over 6 months' time in all groups irrespective of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. At six months post-vaccine, 70% of the infection-naive NH residents (those nursing home vaccinees who had not been previously infected by the virus before vaccination) had neutralization titers at or below the lower limit of detection compared to 16% at 2 weeks after full vaccination.”
In other words, the immunity effectiveness provided by the 'vaccine' had dropped by 84 percent six months after receiving the shot whether the vaccinee had been infected by the virus previously, or not, and that it nearly wiped out any natural immunity a person may have had from a previous infection prior to receiving the 'vaccine.'
“When we look at all the studies of natural immunity, we see that it's robust at eight months and continuing on. Yet, here they're showing in six to eight months, whether you had the infection or not, this vaccine is dropping your antibodies,” explained Mr. Bigtree. “I think we're now starting to see the vaccine is wiping away the immunity that is achieved through previous infection. So, people that are out there, that are previously infected, you'd be nuts to get this vaccine right now and it's incredible that Tony Fauci isn't racing to the microphone cameras saying, 'Whoa, Stop! We made a critical error. We are going to erase your immunity if you get the vaccine after you've been infected.' He's not going to do that because they're trying to change the science as we know it.”
Instead, there is a huge government push for a “booster shot” every six months to compensate for the continually decreasing efficacy, and immune system-destroying attributes, of the 'vaccine.'
“Who are we to believe anymore when there are so many contradictions to what the CDC, Dr. Fauci and President Biden are telling us,” said Neugebauer. “The CDC tells us that those who are vaccinated can carry as large a viral load of the Delta variant as those that have not been vaccinated. So if the vaccinated are just as infectious as the non-vaccinated to the Delta variant why all the mandates for the vaccine. Could it be that everyone who is being vaccinated are participating in the largest clinical trial test of our time?”
It normally takes 10 to 15 years to certify and approve a vaccine as “safe and effective.” After less than a year of scant testing before being released to the general public, these so-called 'vaccines' are actually still in the testing phase of development.
Neugebauer explains the vaccine testing procedure normally done for all other vaccines in the U.S., “These are emergency treatments in the early stages of research and it appears those who have been vaccinated are now the test subjects. Clinical research has some strict protocols beginning with cell cultures, testing on animals then limited human testing in four phases. Phase 1: up to 100 people are tested and followed from one week to a month; Phase 2: typically includes several hundred participants and lasts up to two years. Phase 3: several hundred to 3,000 participants are tested for one to four years; Phase 4: typically includes several thousand individuals who are followed for at least one year or longer. After each phase, the data is examined to assess effectiveness and adverse reactions. The time lines for covid testing were not followed. Whether people realize it or not most phase 3 trials ended by year end 2020 and those who have been 'vaccinated' since than are part of the Phase 4 trial. Since the trials are on-going no one can make claims as to the safety of these “vaccines”.
Not only are the vaccines not safe, by causing heart disease, heart inflammation, blood clotting, miscarriages and paralysis in many thousands of people, they are now being found to actually destroy the immune system - especially any immunity that was acquired by catching the virus and allowing the body to create its own anti-bodies in response to that infection.
Notes:
1. https://gemstatepatriot.com/blog/politically-motivated-medical-black-mail/
2. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415
3. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.15.21262067