Back to Fort Fairfield Journal WFFJ-TV Contact Us
U.S. CDC Has Deliberately Ignored Clear ‘Death’ Signal in COVID-19 "vaccines"
By: Dr. Joseph Mercola
Op-Ed, Fort Fairfield Journal, November 2, 2022
While the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has insisted that no safety signal has ever been triggered in any of the [COVID-19 “vaccine”] adverse event collection databases, analyses of both the V-Safe and VAERS data suggest otherwise.
The COVID jabs are so incredibly hazardous that even the CDC’s flawed formula cannot cover up their lethality. Using the CDC formula, ‘death’ still meets all the safety signal criteria and should have been flagged, yet the CDC has kept mum.
Of critical importance is the CDC’s apparent failure to identify a massive warning signal for death. In an October 3, 2022, article, Steve Kirsch pointed out that the formula the CDC uses to trigger safety signals — described in its VAERS standard operating procedures manual — is “seriously flawed,” as the more dangerous a vaccine is, the less likely it is that a safety signal will be triggered.
However, the COVID jabs are so incredibly hazardous that even the CDC’s flawed formula cannot cover up their lethality.
The FDA is following the same playbook, refusing to release data that rightfully should be made public. We paid for it. The data belong to the American public, and the only reason the FDA, as the CDC, is hiding it is because it proves they’ve acted in bad faith and haven’t followed the data at all.
A Reckoning Is Surely Coming
The crimes committed by the “COVID military-industrial complex” — which includes governments, Big Tech, media, Big Pharma and the bioweapons research industry worldwide — are now so numerous and so egregious in nature, it’s hard to fathom they’ll get away with it forever.
While physicians who are speaking honestly about the vaccine science are labeled “misinformers” and may face disciplinary action, the “consensus” would never be a consensus of physicians treating patients, but of those powerful few who have assumed the role of oversight and whose focus is political policy and future agenda, not patient care.
.