Back to Fort Fairfield Journal      WFFJ-TV      Contact Us


Democrat Rent-A-Mobs Demand Muslim Terrorists Be Allowed into U.S. Unchecked


Democrat Senator Calls for Background Checks on All Immigrants to be Abolished


By:  David Deschesne

Fort Fairfield Journal, February 15, 2017


   In keeping with his promise to secure the nation’s borders against known terrorists, President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order that temporarily banned refugees from seven terror-producing nations. A 90 day ban on travel to the United States for citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen was instituted until a more reliable vetting process could be put in place.  Within hours, protesters began to storm major airports, and by Sunday very large crowds were taking to the streets all over the country in acts of protest that are turning increasingly violent.

   The most recent act of violence was in New Haven, Connecticut where 200 demonstrators marched to Route 304 to block the highway.  The protest also blocked an ambulance with a critically ill patient en route to the hospital, causing ambulance personnel to perform an emergency medical procedure in the ambulance instead of at the hospital.

   But the New Haven demonstration was minor compared to the mob of leftist rioters who are attempting at all costs to disrupt society and governance in the U.S. to support a destructive policy of importing known Muslim terrorists into the country to help destroy it from within.

   On January 20, thousands of protesters descended upon D.C. to disrupt Trump’s inaugural ceremony.  The result of this leftist mob was some of the protesters turning violent and throwing “rocks, bottles, flares, and unknown liquids” at police officers. Six officers were injured while the police arrested 217 of the protesters.  Rioters also set a limousine on fire, damaged other vehicles, smashed in store windows, destroyed other pieces of property and set other objects aflame while armed with hammers, crowbars and other weapons.

   In Portland, Oregon, rioters armed with sticks and clubs attacked officers. In Seattle, Washington, protesters threw bricks at the police and a man was shot. All of these actions are  typical of an entitled, narcissistic, spoiled brat, liberal left wing.

   “Behind the mass protests, choreographed chants and acts of violence, leaders of anti-Trump ‘resistance’ efforts are communicating the same simple but dark message: they want to make America ‘ungovernable’ for the president of the United States,” said Steve Watson, from  “These protesters say they will do whatever it takes to keep Trump from enacting his agenda, and many of them have shown a willingness to destroy public property, assault law enforcement officers and inflict violence upon their fellow citizens.”

   What’s being lost in the noise is the fact that the Trump executive order doesn’t ban all Muslims.  Indeed, it only affects around 13 percent of the world’s 1.6 billion Muslim population and still allows the other 87 percent to come in.  Trump did not arbitrarily create the banned nations list out of whole cloth.  Rather, he adopted the list authorized by former Presidential impersonator Barack Hussein-Obama. 

   According to the draft copy of Trump’s executive order, the countries whose citizens are barred entirely from entering the United States is based on a bill that Obama signed into law in December, 2015. Obama signed the Visa Waiver Program Improvement and Terrorist Travel Prevention Act as part of an omnibus spending bill. The legislation restricted access to the Visa Waiver Program, which allows citizens from 38 countries who are visiting the United States for less than 90 days to enter without a visa.  Those countries that received restricted access under Obama are the ones Trump carried through to his executive order.

   The 90-day temporary block on new visas does not apply to citizens of the six countries with the largest Muslim populations, as determined by Pew Research— Indonesia (209 million), India (176 million), Pakistan (167 million), Bangladesh (134 million), Nigeria (77 million), and Egypt (76 million).

   This begs the question, why are so many thousands of people all simultaneously coming out of joint with excessive violence and destructive behavior?  One plausible explanation is the use of privately funded, leftist “rent-a-mobs.”

   These rent-a-mobs are funded by large corporate donors who sympathize with the Communist left and seek to destroy the U.S. from within.  The tactic provides for a small cadre of paid actors to go to an area of impact - in this case large airports - and create the seeds for a mob scene.  Using social media and an acquiescent and sympathetic communist news media, the rent-a-mob then recruits local leftists to join the rally which usually ends up with violence and destruction to private property.

   This tactic creates the illusion of the overall protest being organic and spontaneously comprised of local, grass-roots individuals trying to express their concerns.  When in reality, it was scripted, choreographed and implemented by professional facilitators, by design, who usually end up leaving the scene after the violence starts and let the locals be the ones who get arrested.

   As revealed in Alex Jones’ investigative documentary video, Police State II: The Takeover, leftist rent-a-mobs called “The Black Block” were deployed in the 1999 World Trade Organization (WTO) protests in Seattle, Washington.  Using the Hegelian Dialectic of Thesis, Anti-thesis, Synthesis a/k/a “Problem, Reaction, Solution” the Black Block was deployed and instructed to do damage to the city to give the appearance that the peaceful protestors were the ones causing the damage, looting and destruction to that area in order to get a large part of the  city deemed a “No Protest Zone.” This was done to allow the globalist corporate chieftains, in charge of the WTO, the police-secured peace and sanctity they needed in order to develop a blueprint to destroy the economic progress and national sovereignty of the United States into the future.

   Cuban communist agitator and revolutionary, Ernesto “Che” Guevara noted the importance of communication and propaganda during revolutionary unrest in his 1961 tract, Guerilla Warfare.  At the time, he considered radio to be the most effective tool to disseminate the revolutionaries’ propaganda.  “At moments when war fever is more or less palpitating in every one region or a country, the inspiring, burning word increases this fever and communicates it to every one of the future combatants.  It explains, teaches, fires and fixes the future positions of both friends and enemies.” 

   The modern day version of the radio is the internet.  With social network sites such as Facebook and Twitter, the privately-funded rent-a-mobs can ply their trade covertly, appearing as if they were local, ordinary people chatting on the social networks, rather than the well-funded psychopolitical operators they are, hired and funded to create an artificial social disunity to ultimately bring about their form of communist-inspired, authoritarian government. 

   But rent-a-mobs come with a price.  They have to be funded and that funding can come from some very lucrative sources who are openly hostile to the freedom and free-market capitalist structure that made America great to begin with.

   According to Fred Lucas from, more than a dozen lawsuits and counting have been filed against President Trump’s executive order that temporarily blocks visas from terrorist-producing countries. “Looking beyond the handful of emotional personal stories that are gaining the media’s sympathy there is a more predictable political power dynamic at play,” wrote Lucas.  “The lawsuits largely stem from organizations bankrolled by billionaire leftist George Soros and Democratic state attorneys general.”

   During an anti-Trump protest in Seattle, an activist associated with the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement took to the megaphone to voice her support for, among other things, “killing people,” and “killing the White House.”

   In a video of the event posted on YouTube the female activist, identified as a teacher, stated; “And we need to start killing people. First off, we need to start killing the White House. The White House must die. The White House, your f-ing White House, your f-ing Presidents, they must go! F*** the White House.”

   “Pay the f*** up, pay the f*** up. It ain’t just your f-ing time, its your f-ing money, and now your f-ing life is devoted to social change,” she said.

   Writing for The New American, syndicated columnist, Walter Williams noted the difference in protest styles between conservatives and now the far-left progressives.  “One can only imagine the widespread media, political and intellectual condemnation of Republicans and conservatives if, after the inauguration of Barack Obama, they had gone on a violent and vicious tear all over the nation as did Democrats and liberals after the inauguration of President Donald Trump. They committed acts such as assaulting Trump supporters, setting fires and stoning police. Suppose Republicans/conservatives had carried signs that read ‘F--- Obama’ or talked about ‘blowing up the White House.’ The news media, instead of calling them protesters, would have labeled them evil racists, obstructionists and everything else except a child of God. The reason for the difference in treatment is simple. Republicans and conservatives are held — and hold themselves — to higher standards of behavior. By contrast, Democrats and liberals are held — and hold themselves — to less civilized standards of behavior.”

   Far left-wing Democrat politicians even seem to be confused on the issue of prohibiting potential Muslim terrorists into the country.  While he is opposed to Trump’s temporary travel ban now, Senator Charles Schumar, in 2015 was in support of it under Obama’s watch.  According to a November, 2015 article in The Hill:  “Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), the third ranking member of the Senate Democratic leadership, on Tuesday said it may be necessary to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees in the United States...Schumer, however, declined to take the option off the table ahead of a special briefing scheduled for Wednesday afternoon on the process that is now used to vet refugees entering the United States.”

   Meanwhile, Senator Chris Murphy (D-Connecticut) suggested he would like the United States to move towards a system of “absolutely no screening” for immigrants, while imposing additional gun control measures to prohibit Americans’ ability to defend themselves from the violent  Muslim invaders.

   During a recent appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, Senator Murphy suggested having “a discussion about a pathway in which there is absolutely no screening” for immigrants entering the United States, citing VISA waiver agreements between the United States and Europe to demonstrate the ability of people to enter the U.S. “without almost any security vet.”

   Clifford Cunningham, from notes that despite their outrage over President Trump’s executive order barring refugees from seven primarily Muslim countries, numerous far-left Democrats once opposed admitting refugees fleeing the collapse of South Vietnam.

   “While citizens of South Vietnam sought refuge in the United States following their country’s defeat by communist forces from North Vietnam, many liberal Democrats opposed efforts by Republican President Gerald Ford to admit them,” said Cunningham.  “The group of Democrats included then-Governor of California Jerry Brown (who currently serves as the state’s governor), then-Delaware Senator Joe Biden, former Presidential candidate and South Dakota Senator George McGovern, and New York Representative Elizabeth Holtzman.”

   Conservative radio talk show host, Rush Limbaugh said Trump’s real problem isn’t so much with leftist liberals as it is with the weak-kneed Republicans in Congress.  “This is the kind of uprising in the media, uprising on the left that just sends chills down the spines of the average, ordinary Washington Republican, and they cave within seconds to things like this, as [Sen. John] McCain and Lindsey Graham predictably and right on schedule have done, by coming out and saying they profoundly disagree. This has always been, as far as I’m concerned, the wild card for anything Trump does, and that is the Republican and the Republican leadership in Congress,” said Limbaugh.  “This is the official policy of Trump opposition to simply resist everything because that’s all they can do. They can’t stop it unless the Republicans cave and join them. If the Republicans stay unified, House and Senate, and in support of the Trump agenda, then there’s nothing the Democrats can do.”

   While lukewarm conservatives in Congress are a problem, another big problem is that many Congressional Republicans are shills. That is, they are communist agitators who got themselves purposefully and covertly elected as Republican in order to cooperate with the Democrats to destroy the U.S. from within, using violent Muslim invaders as the catalyst.